Quorum

In DAOs, governance decisions are typically made through token-based voting. To prevent manipulation and ensure broad participation, a quorum threshold is set. This means that for a proposal to be considered legitimate, a certain percentage or number of votes must be cast.



🔑 Key Aspects of Quorum in DAOs:

  • Participation Requirement – Ensures that governance decisions reflect the will of a sufficiently large portion of token holders.
  • Prevention of Low-Engagement Decisions – Without a quorum, a small group of voters could pass critical decisions with minimal participation.
  • Dynamic or Fixed Thresholds – Some DAOs set a fixed quorum (e.g., 4% of total governance tokens), while others adjust based on previous voter turnout or governance model changes.


Types of Quorum in DAO Governance:

  1. Absolute Quorum – Requires a fixed percentage of all governance tokens to participate.
  2. Relative Quorum – Based on the percentage of participating voters rather than total governance supply.
  3. Dynamic Quorum – Adjusts based on past voting activity to prevent governance stagnation.


🏛 Example 1: MakerDAO Governance Quorum

MakerDAO requires a minimum number of votes before governance decisions, such as adjusting the DAI stability fee, can be enacted. If the quorum is not met, the proposal fails even if a majority of voters support it.



🏛 Example 2: Uniswap Governance Quorum

Uniswap’s DAO governance requires a quorum of at least 4% of all UNI tokens in circulation for proposals to be passed. This prevents governance changes from being decided by a small subset of token holders.



📚 References

  1. MakerDAO - Governance Framework
  2. Uniswap - Governance Proposal Voting Requirements


⚠️ Controversies & Misconceptions

  • “A quorum means a simple majority vote is required” – False. A quorum only ensures a minimum level of participation; the actual vote outcome is determined by the voting system in place.
  • “A low quorum is better for faster decision-making” – While a low quorum increases proposal passage rates, it can also lead to governance capture by a small group of voters.


🚀 Conclusion

A quorum is essential for maintaining fairness and legitimacy in DAO governance. By requiring a minimum level of participation, it prevents governance from being controlled by a small minority while ensuring important decisions reflect broader community engagement. However, setting an appropriate quorum level is a delicate balance between preventing voter apathy and avoiding governance paralysis.

Related Terms

Sick of boring emails?

We are too. So we're trying to deliver ton of value biweekly

By clicking the button I accept Molecula Privacy Policy

Subscribe
Subscribe
Subscribe