Quorum

In DAOs, governance decisions are typically made through token-based voting. To prevent manipulation and ensure broad participation, a quorum threshold is set. This means that for a proposal to be considered legitimate, a certain percentage or number of votes must be cast.



🔑 Key Aspects of Quorum in DAOs:

  • Participation Requirement – Ensures that governance decisions reflect the will of a sufficiently large portion of token holders.
  • Prevention of Low-Engagement Decisions – Without a quorum, a small group of voters could pass critical decisions with minimal participation.
  • Dynamic or Fixed Thresholds – Some DAOs set a fixed quorum (e.g., 4% of total governance tokens), while others adjust based on previous voter turnout or governance model changes.


Types of Quorum in DAO Governance:

  1. Absolute Quorum – Requires a fixed percentage of all governance tokens to participate.
  2. Relative Quorum – Based on the percentage of participating voters rather than total governance supply.
  3. Dynamic Quorum – Adjusts based on past voting activity to prevent governance stagnation.


🏛 Example 1: MakerDAO Governance Quorum

MakerDAO requires a minimum number of votes before governance decisions, such as adjusting the DAI stability fee, can be enacted. If the quorum is not met, the proposal fails even if a majority of voters support it.



🏛 Example 2: Uniswap Governance Quorum

Uniswap’s DAO governance requires a quorum of at least 4% of all UNI tokens in circulation for proposals to be passed. This prevents governance changes from being decided by a small subset of token holders.



📚 References

  1. MakerDAO - Governance Framework
  2. Uniswap - Governance Proposal Voting Requirements


⚠️ Controversies & Misconceptions

  • “A quorum means a simple majority vote is required” – False. A quorum only ensures a minimum level of participation; the actual vote outcome is determined by the voting system in place.
  • “A low quorum is better for faster decision-making” – While a low quorum increases proposal passage rates, it can also lead to governance capture by a small group of voters.


🚀 Conclusion

A quorum is essential for maintaining fairness and legitimacy in DAO governance. By requiring a minimum level of participation, it prevents governance from being controlled by a small minority while ensuring important decisions reflect broader community engagement. However, setting an appropriate quorum level is a delicate balance between preventing voter apathy and avoiding governance paralysis.

Sick of boring emails?

We are too. So we're trying to deliver ton of value biweekly

By clicking the button I accept Molecula Privacy Policy

Subscribe
Subscribe
Subscribe